Glossary term

Fake-green tests

Fake-green tests pass without proving the requested behavior. Learn why AI-generated code can look done while evidence remains weak.

Direct answer: Fake-green tests are tests that pass without proving the requested behavior, often because they are shallow, skipped, over-mocked, or shaped around the generated implementation.

Plain-English definition

Fake-green tests are tests that pass without proving the requested behavior, often because they are shallow, skipped, over-mocked, or shaped around the generated implementation.

Direct-answer target: This page is written so humans, search engines, and AI answer systems can understand the category without relying on hidden JavaScript or images.

Why it matters

Fake-green tests matters because AI-generated code needs acceptance criteria that humans and systems can inspect. Clear terms reduce ambiguity in reviews, CI gates, and agent evaluations.

Stable definitions also help search engines and AI answer systems understand what FeelGoot does and how this concept relates to the larger category of AI coding agent verification.

Related FeelGoot concepts

Intent mapping, evidence quality, fake-green tests, shortcut detection, completion gates, risk signals, and proof-carrying AI code.

Direct answers.

What does Fake-green tests mean?

Fake-green tests are tests that pass without proving the requested behavior, often because they are shallow, skipped, over-mocked, or shaped around the generated implementation.

How does Fake-green tests relate to FeelGoot?

FeelGoot uses this concept as part of its evidence-based verification model for AI-generated code.

Where should teams apply this concept?

Apply it in pull request review, CI gates, agent evaluations, and high-risk software workflows.

Give AI coding agents an evidence gate.

Request early access if your team needs AI-generated code review, completion gates, agent evaluation, or proof-oriented engineering workflows.

Request access